Second
Wave feminist linguistics was concerned with analysing the inherent meanings
of words and often made statements about the abstract meanings of words, constructing
dictionaries of sexist language and advising on the avoidance of certain words
(Kramarae & Treichler, 1985; Miller and Swift,1981). There was also a
tendency to assume that certain words or ways of speaking were simply more
powerful than others; thus, interrupting was seen as a powerful strategy,
and hesitating was seen to be a powerless strategy.
After Cameron et.al's work on the multifunctionality of tag-questions
and Michael Toolan's work on the difficulty of assigning clear functions to
specific formal features, the notion that there was a clear link to be made
between power and, for example, talking time was made more problematic (Cameron
et.al.1988; Toolan, 1996; see for a discussion Thornborrow, 2002) Third Wave
feminist linguistics focuses on the way that words are made to mean in specific
ways and function to achieve certain purposes in particular contexts (Christie,
2001). Thus, rather than discussing
oppressive global social structures such
as patriarchy, Third Wave feminists analyse the way that gender and conflict
are managed by women at a local level (Cameron,
1998) . It is still possible to refer to structural inequality and to highlight
instances of discrimination, but Third Wave feminist linguistics is more concerned
with variability and resistance than on making global statements about the
condition of women in relation to language use. Thus, whilst a Second Wave
analysis might focus on the use of the generic pronoun `he' to refer to both
men and women, or the derogatory terms used to describe women such as `bitch'
or `slag', a Third Wave feminist analysis might focus on the way that within
a particular context, a certain hesitation and ironic intonation might be
considered to be sexist when articulating
the word `chairperson' to describe a female chair.
However, whilst this local focus helps women to describe practices
which discriminate against them, Third Wave feminists find it difficult to
refer to global, structural and systematic forms of discrimination.
Rather
than meanings being imposed on women, Third Wave feminists consider meanings
to be co-constructed. Thus within particular contexts, women and men
engage in the contestation and affirmation of particular types of practices
and interpretations. What something
means in a particular context is the result of
the actions of all of the individuals concerned, negotiating with the institutional constraints
of status and institutionalised linguistic routines. For example, Joanna Thornborrow, in
her analysis of an interview between a woman and two police officers, where
the woman claims that she has been raped and the police try to throw doubt
on the veracity of her claim, by suggesting that she is mentally ill, the
woman plays an active role in contesting their assertions (Thornborrow, 2002). A Second Wave
feminist analysis would analyse this interaction as the police oppressing
and silencing the woman; however, this woman seems to have accrued to herself
a certain amount of what I have called interactive power, that is, she has
drawn on linguistic resources which
were available within that particular
context, using questions and rebuttals to challenge her characterisation by
the police as an untrustworthy person (Mills, forthcoming). Ultimately, however,
the police officers' version of events seems to be the one which holds sway,
even though the woman's interventions are important in defining the way that
the interview takes shape - the institutional status of the police officers
plays an crucial role in their version being seen as the `truth'. (see also,
Potter, 1996) We cannot see this woman
as simply powerless as a Second Wave feminist analysis might have done. However
a Third Wave feminist analysis does not seem to be able to argue for a change
in the way that police interviews are carried out, or call for training for
police officers in the type of language which it is appropriate to use with
rape victims.