Russell West. Spatial Representations and the Jacobean Stage: From Shakespeare to Webster. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. 276pp. ISBN 0 333 97373 9.
Peter Sillitoe
University of Sheffield
egp02ps@sheffield.ac.uk
Sillitoe, Peter. Review of Spatial Representations and the Jacobean Stage: From Shakespeare to Webster. Early Modern Literary Studies 10.3 (January, 2005) 5.1-9<URL: http://purl.oclc.org/emls/10-3/revsilli.html>.
This brilliant, theoretically complex book is a welcome
addition to the growing body of Renaissance critical discourse on social
space and its relationship to the literary and cultural environment of the
early modern period. West relates the spatial dynamics of onstage
activity and staging at the Jacobean theatre to the changes and cultural
dislocations encountered and experienced by many in the early seventeenth
century, including enclosure and social mobility. Although historical
and literary sources from the period are utilised throughout the study,
West’s focus on the theatrical representation of various social spaces enables
him to draw on a range of familiar and important spatial theorists, including
Henri Lefebvre and Michel Foucault.
The rather brief introduction on “staging space” makes
it clear that the work will emphasise performative aspects as well as the
contextual framework of various literary texts, and as West puts it himself,
he channels the reader’s attention towards the Jacobean theatre “as an ostentatiously
spatial art-form” that “interacts with the contexts of early modern society”
(p. 3). In the introduction, however, West argues persuasively for
the growing importance of spatial enquiry in early modern studies, though
it is puzzling that the work does not make better use of Janette Dillon’s
excellent study on specific civic and courtly spaces in Renaissance England,
Theatre, Court and City, 1595-1610: Drama and Social Space in London.
This untypical oversight of modern critical work seems particularly
odd when we realise that one of West’s own chapters deals with the space
of the Jacobean court and early Stuart masquing culture, though it is again
important to stress that West employs other recent ideas on space – a movement
he usefully labels the “‘spatial turn’ in contemporary culture” (4) – in
order to voice his own intelligent and coherent perspective on theatrical
texts and societal contexts.
West proceeds to apply theoretical notions of space to
various aspects of life in the period, including mobility and changes in
intellectual thought, yet the book’s greatest strength is perhaps the way
in which relatively unexpected modes of enquiry into these intellectual
spaces are read alongside more predictable spatial environments such as
the court and the theatrical market, all expertly reined in under the central
aim of investigating theatrical production. The critic quite rightly
wants “to do justice to the variety of human existence and its representation
on the early modern stage, rather than locking that variety into the restricted
bounds of a narrow definition” (5). This important point should permit
access to the book for researchers not familiar with work on space, as West
has compiled an interesting study of more general early modern culture,
and this wide-ranging approach perhaps explains the limit imposed by West
in terms of the Jacobean emphasis, with the Elizabethan stage only touched
upon.
Those seeking a clearer focus for the book other than
context and performance issues will obviously find this in the matter of
social space itself, and West’s first chapter on the staging of spaces is
particularly good at articulating Jacobean ideas on space, lending an important
emphasis to the ways in which language and thought were
seen as spatial realms by many writers in the period, an element the critic
then links to issues of rank and identity. Indeed, chapter one successfully
positions several Renaissance dramatic texts as clear examples of the spatial
dynamics inherent in the period’s processes and conceptualisations of thought,
language and rhetoric, and West’s own close-reading skills are demonstrated
as he offers sensitive explorations of passages of dramatic writing.
The second chapter deals with the Jacobean court and
the performance of the masques. This important study can now be read
alongside West’s more recent work on perspective in the masque, published
in The Seventeenth Century. In the book’s second chapter, though,
West is particularly good at bringing out some quite precise intricacies
of various masque texts, demonstrating how the literary works often foreground
various spaces before the court spectators, and may even transform perceptions
through the act of performance. In light of this, West offers a very
interesting discussion of the anti-masque world while also indicating the
overall importance of the King as a visual signifier of authority.
The chapter on money and mobility cleverly links the
concept of material and cultural exchange to Lefebvre’s influential work
on the “production” of space, and, although this may appear to be something
of an imaginative leap, the piece works very well, as West is able to show
how “physical space became increasingly commodified” during the period (83),
and how, rather unsurprisingly, the dramatists can be located amongst the
emerging capitalist enterprises of Jacobean England. Yet West’s apparent
gift for pointing out fascinating material in a concise and readable style
allows him to stress a link between money and a certain fluidity in terms
of exchange, as “[i]t is not by chance that money is referred to by the
term ‘liquid’, with its capacity to move from one place to another in ways
that goods can not” (87). Typically, West proceeds to prove this observation
by giving detailed close readings of texts, including The Alchemist,
Volpone, A Chaste Maid in Cheapside, and The Merchant
of Venice, linking drama to economic exchange in a way that never loses
sight of the spatial dynamics that are of central importance.
The fourth chapter, on social mobility, is another piece
that is surprising in terms of the central and binding topic of space, yet
West manages to link aspects of the theatre to issues of land and mobility
through readings of plays, various printed sources from the period, and
the work of modern historians, in order to illustrate the complex dynamics
of social change and mobility. The discussion touches upon aristocratic
hospitality and housing and the role of the family, neatly tracing these
features in drama, including an enjoyable and informative passage on Romeo
and Juliet. However, it is testament to the sheer range and depth
of West’s important book that he still manages to turn the reader’s attention
to costume and dress in a brilliant passage that points up the changing
social life of Jacobean England.
“Demographic mobility” is the focal point for another
ambitious chapter, as West adds to the growing body of work on the mapping
of spatial realms in the English Renaissance with another sharp observation.
As West puts it: “[M]apping simultaneously represented an increasing
knowledge about and thus accessibility of the regions of England, and conversely,
a mode of regional self-knowledge signifying increasing resistance to absolute
monarchical rule” (149). It is this dual stress on the regional and
the national, micro and macro worlds that consolidates the truly spatial
nature of West’s project, a feature the author takes to a logical conclusion
by focusing, in chapter six, on dramatic writing about travel and enterprise
at the London theatres, including a discussion of some rather neglected
texts, such as The Travels of the Three English Brothers and The
Sea Voyage. Indeed, it is another pleasing feature of the book’s
scope that although the title prioritises familiar figures such as Shakespeare
and Webster, West manages to look beyond these to other writers from the
Jacobean stage, and this chapter is no exception as the plays are explored
with an understanding of the limits of early-Stuart expansionist foreign
policy. However, one of the chapter’s most interesting concerns is
the coupling together of two related points, in that West shows how theatrical
discourse helped to define the self-image of the English people by staging
what they were not in the travel plays, while, at the same time,
the author traces challenges to the formation of Englishness in the surviving
drama. Likewise, there is some important work here on the relationship
between the theatrical, imagined spaces of Antony and Cleopatra,
identity, and the physicality of the actual theatres in Jacobean
London, as well as a persuasive account of how The Tempest deploys
aspects of space in terms of power and authority.
The book’s final chapter is astonishingly original and will hopefully point the way ahead for other Renaissance scholarship into space and literature, as West expands the spatial theme in order to incorporate what he terms “intellectual mobility”. In actuality, this refers to a focus upon changing approaches to subjectivity and selfhood in the period, though it should be clear by now that West is not interested in merely reworking old theoretical ground. Rather, a fresh perspective is permitted once more, and this section, like other approaches in the book, is given impetus by West’s determination to constantly renegotiate the terms of spatial inquiry in this highly impressive work.
Works cited
Responses to this piece intended for the Readers' Forum may be sent to the Editor at M.Steggle@shu.ac.uk.
©
2005-, Matthew Steggle (Editor, EMLS).